tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1036096050391052915.post3326461731339744742..comments2016-08-29T13:33:53.200+02:00Comments on Fuel for the Future: Response to Oliver Tickell’s Anti-Thorium ArticleDreamChaserhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16472478092348116543noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1036096050391052915.post-31710737732950938272013-03-22T11:50:16.555+01:002013-03-22T11:50:16.555+01:00Having just read Robert Hargraves book 'Thoriu...Having just read Robert Hargraves book 'Thorium - energy cheaper than coal' I fully concur with the above rebuttal of Mr. Tickle's assertions that renewables are a more viable long term solution than LFTR molten salt reactors. Baseload electricity production has to be reliable and constant which renewables are not. China and India are leading the way so once they can demonstrate a successful pilot plant I would hope the naysayers will realise that 4th generation nuclear power can be intrinsically safe, cheaper than coal/gas and green. Why not divert some resources from ITER (a noble but fruitless project) towards LFTR development?Mark Campeynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1036096050391052915.post-12401862209378372392013-01-17T22:26:28.710+01:002013-01-17T22:26:28.710+01:00Nice rebuttal sir!Nice rebuttal sir!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05967020786459728266noreply@blogger.com